Comments on: Local Loop Unbundling http://www.mattb.net.nz/blog/2006/05/04/local-loop-unbundling/ Matt Browns thoughts on Life, Linux and lots of other things... Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:05:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Juha http://www.mattb.net.nz/blog/2006/05/04/local-loop-unbundling/comment-page-1/#comment-1954 Juha Mon, 08 May 2006 02:26:48 +0000 http://www.mattb.net.nz/blog/2006/05/04/local-loop-unbundling/#comment-1954 That's better :) That’s better :)

]]> By: Juha http://www.mattb.net.nz/blog/2006/05/04/local-loop-unbundling/comment-page-1/#comment-1953 Juha Mon, 08 May 2006 02:03:42 +0000 http://www.mattb.net.nz/blog/2006/05/04/local-loop-unbundling/#comment-1953 Good analysis, but the current RUBS upstream is 128kbit/s :). Also check out http://techremarks.com - apparently we have had "naked DSL" all along! I didn't know that. What's good about RUBS Mk II is the ComCom will dimension it. Should put an end to Telecom's awkward rules. The greater information disclosure requirement should also be helpful, but I hope the ComCom will do something about the provisioning hassles too. Good analysis, but the current RUBS upstream is 128kbit/s :) .

Also check out http://techremarks.com – apparently we have had “naked DSL” all along! I didn’t know that.

What’s good about RUBS Mk II is the ComCom will dimension it. Should put an end to Telecom’s awkward rules. The greater information disclosure requirement should also be helpful, but I hope the ComCom will do something about the provisioning hassles too.

]]>